zmodem wrote:
> It looks like this commit landed, so is it safe to say I don't have revert
> this?
Yes, that one should unblock us, so there's no panic.
We should still fix this though.
> Is the assumption that Clang's headers provide the exact same header to
> intrinsic declaration mapping as MSVC's headers?
It's never going to be exact, but the idea is that they should be compatible.
If the MSVC way is to write
```
#include <intrin.h>
void f() { __yield(); }
```
we want that to work with clang-cl too.
And if the include is missing, we shouldn't suggest `arm_acle.h`, because that
suggestion is not compatible with MSVC.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140910
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
