llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> --- Patch is 32.39 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138293.diff 32 Files Affected: - (modified) .github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml (+4-4) - (modified) libcxx/docs/index.rst (+1-1) - (modified) libcxx/src/experimental/time_zone.cpp (+8) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp (+2-2) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp (+6) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp (+15) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp (+10) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp (+12) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp (+2-2) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp (+2-2) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.void/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp (+2-2) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.formatter/format.formatter.spec/formatter.char_array.pass.cpp (+1-1) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp (+7) - (renamed) libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp (+1-1) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp (+3) - (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp (+1-1) - (modified) libcxxabi/test/catch_member_function_pointer_02.pass.cpp (+1-1) - (modified) libunwind/cmake/config-ix.cmake (-65) - (modified) libunwind/src/CMakeLists.txt (-12) ``````````diff diff --git a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml index 80f2432b78dea..f0bdf6c0b5899 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml +++ b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ jobs: cxx: [ 'clang++-21' ] include: - config: 'generic-gcc' - cc: 'gcc-14' - cxx: 'g++-14' + cc: 'gcc-15' + cxx: 'g++-15' steps: - uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4.2.2 - name: ${{ matrix.config }}.${{ matrix.cxx }} @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ jobs: cxx: [ 'clang++-21' ] include: - config: 'generic-gcc-cxx11' - cc: 'gcc-14' - cxx: 'g++-14' + cc: 'gcc-15' + cxx: 'g++-15' - config: 'generic-cxx26' cc: 'clang-20' cxx: 'clang++-20' diff --git a/libcxx/docs/index.rst b/libcxx/docs/index.rst index a8b0d5ce1ee97..44737b379f189 100644 --- a/libcxx/docs/index.rst +++ b/libcxx/docs/index.rst @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Compiler Versions Restrictions Support policy Clang 19, 20, 21-git latest two stable releases per `LLVM's release page <https://releases.llvm.org>`_ and the development version AppleClang 15 latest stable release per `Xcode's release page <https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode-release-notes>`_ Open XL 17.1.3 (AIX) latest stable release per `Open XL's documentation page <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/openxl-c-and-cpp-aix>`_ -GCC 14 In C++11 or later only latest stable release per `GCC's release page <https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html>`_ +GCC 15 In C++11 or later only latest stable release per `GCC's release page <https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html>`_ ============ =================== ========================== ===================== Libc++ also supports common platforms and architectures: diff --git a/libcxx/src/experimental/time_zone.cpp b/libcxx/src/experimental/time_zone.cpp index 289164ab12036..d4246235c00f5 100644 --- a/libcxx/src/experimental/time_zone.cpp +++ b/libcxx/src/experimental/time_zone.cpp @@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ // These quirks often use a 12h interval; this is the scan interval of zdump, // which implies there are no sys_info objects with a duration of less than 12h. +// Work around https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120502 + +#include <__config> + +#ifdef _LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC +# pragma GCC optimize("-O0") +#endif + #include <algorithm> #include <cctype> #include <chrono> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp index 08d8e119a4d24..1e89cd272e643 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ constexpr bool test() { std::string a[] = {str1, str1, str, str1, str1}; auto whole = std::ranges::subrange(forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a)), forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a + 5))); - bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole.begin(), whole.end(), "hello world", [&](const std::string i) { + bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole.begin(), whole.end(), +"hello world", [&](const std::string i) { ++projection_count; return i; }); @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ constexpr bool test() { std::string a[] = {str1, str1, str, str1, str1}; auto whole = std::ranges::subrange(forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a)), forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a + 5))); - bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole, "hello world", [&](const std::string i) { + bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole, +"hello world", [&](const std::string i) { ++projection_count; return i; }); diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp index ca0f40eb77d49..0531c0e096a13 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <vector> #include "compare_types.h" +#include "test_macros.h" namespace fundamentals { static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int>); @@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned char&&>); static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned short const&&>); static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned int volatile&&>); static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned long const volatile&&>); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int[5]>); +#else +static_assert(!std::equality_comparable<int[5]>); +#endif static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (*)(int)>); static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (&)(int)>); static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (*)(int) noexcept>); diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp index 0afbe582ba896..2f8d7862c0f4d 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp @@ -107,7 +107,12 @@ static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with < int, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ()); static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int*>()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int[5]>()); +#else +static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (*)()>()); static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (&)()>()); static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (S::*)()>()); @@ -148,7 +153,12 @@ static_assert( static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with < int*, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int[5]>()); +#else +static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (*)()>()); static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (&)()>()); static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (S::*)()>()); @@ -942,7 +952,12 @@ static_assert( static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int>()); static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int*>()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int[5]>()); +#else +static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (*)()>()); static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (&)()>()); static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (S::*)()>()); diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp index 6f8324eaf7647..5959f70cf3963 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp @@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned char&&>()); static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned short const&&>()); static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned int volatile&&>()); static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned long const volatile&&>()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26 +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (*)(int)>()); static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (&)(int)>()); static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (*)(int) noexcept>()); diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp index dffc33265aebf..398ef445baf9d 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp @@ -89,7 +89,12 @@ static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int, int (S::*)() const volatile&&>()) static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ()); static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int*>()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int[5]>()); +#else +static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (*)()>()); static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (&)()>()); static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (S::*)()>()); @@ -117,7 +122,12 @@ static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int*, int (S::*)() volatile&& noexce static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (S::*)() const volatile&&>()); static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int*, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ()); +// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet. +#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int[5]>()); +#else +static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int[5]>()); +#endif static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (*)()>()); static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (&)()>()); static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (S::*)()>()); diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp index 6a2b098c1b573..9ee32b8417832 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ // UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <new> #include <cassert> #include <limits> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp index 437d064307735..4fdcc3b535a8d 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ // asan and msan will not call the new handler. // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <new> #include <cstddef> #include <cassert> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp index 4e34ebcb46c7d..4dfaf7a30d7a2 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ // UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + // Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions, // nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS. // XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}} diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp index c9b59ecaff396..a1b8466340a2a 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ // asan and msan will not call the new handler. // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + // Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions, // nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS. // XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}} diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp index 6a515555e6dbd..346e881d016be 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ // UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <new> #include <cassert> #include <limits> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp index 729ef3ec46b0c..0013dd3d0cbc3 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ // asan and msan will not call the new handler. // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <new> #include <cstddef> #include <cassert> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp index 7694314c87bf3..fbeb880c83d8d 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ // UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + // Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions, // nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS. // XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}} diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp index 5d321f08282b2..59ecbe205513a 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ // asan and msan will not call the new handler. // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete +// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here) +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + // Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions, // nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS. // XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}} diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp index c3a88af92d360..c05a9434175a8 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ // discrete_distribution(size_t nw, double xmin, double xmax, // UnaryOperation fw); +// There is a bogus diagnostic about a too large allocation +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <random> #include <cassert> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp index 7ef936b7fc355..206bf5a0eb8a2 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ // param_type(size_t nw, double xmin, double xmax, // UnaryOperation fw); +// There is a bogus diagnostic about a too large allocation +// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than + #include <random> #include <cassert> diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp index f4e87bb47399e..521c0b1610bce 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp @@ -312,7 +312,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() { // Leading separator. { std::array expected = {""sv, "abc"sv, "def"sv}; +// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here? +#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC test_one(" abc def"sv, short_sep, expected); +#endif test_one("12abc12def"sv, long_sep, expected); } @@ -326,7 +329,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() { // Input consisting of a single separator. { std::array expected = {""sv, ""sv}; +// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here? +#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC test_one(" "sv, short_sep, expected); +#endif test_one("12"sv, long_sep, expected); } @@ -354,7 +360,10 @@ co... [truncated] `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138293 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
