xTachyon wrote: > It means all such string accesses would require two indirections to get to > the string data
I don't think that's true. Getting the pointer would be `ptr+sizeof(size_t)`. > I also wonder if we want to be slightly less memory efficient and add a > version field in case we need to make changes again in the future Where would this go? The `Data` structure would be private API, not exposed, so it shouldn't matter when we change it. I don't understand very well the last messages of you and [cor3ntin](https://github.com/cor3ntin), sorry. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134551 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
