================
@@ -4966,6 +4966,89 @@ If no address spaces names are provided, all address
spaces are fenced.
__builtin_amdgcn_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "workgroup", "local")
__builtin_amdgcn_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "workgroup", "local", "global")
+__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is and __builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+``__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is`` and ``__builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable`` provide
+a functional mechanism for programatically querying:
+
+* the identity of the current target processor;
+* the capability of the current target processor to invoke a particular
builtin.
+
+**Syntax**:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ __amdgpu_feature_predicate_t __builtin_amdgcn_processor_is(const char*);
+ __amdgpu_feature_predicate_t __builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(builtin_name);
+
+**Example of use**:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ if (__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1201") ||
+ __builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(__builtin_amdgcn_s_sleep_var))
+ __builtin_amdgcn_s_sleep_var(x);
+
+ if (!__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx906"))
+ __builtin_amdgcn_s_wait_event_export_ready();
+ else if (__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1010") ||
+ __builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1101"))
+ __builtin_amdgcn_s_ttracedata_imm(1);
+
+ while (__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1101")) *p += x;
+
+ do {
+ break;
+ } while (__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1010"));
+
+ for (; __builtin_amdgcn_processor_is("gfx1201"); ++*p) break;
+
+ if
(__builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(__builtin_amdgcn_s_wait_event_export_ready))
+ __builtin_amdgcn_s_wait_event_export_ready();
+ else if (__builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(__builtin_amdgcn_s_ttracedata_imm))
+ __builtin_amdgcn_s_ttracedata_imm(1);
+
+ do {
+ break;
+ } while (
+ __builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(__builtin_amdgcn_global_load_tr_b64_i32));
+
+ for (; __builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable(__builtin_amdgcn_permlane64); ++*p)
+ break;
+
+**Description**:
+
+The builtins return a value of type ``__amdgpu_feature_predicate_t``, which is
a
+target specific type that behaves as if its C++ definition was the following:
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Does this builtin work in C? If so, the docs should be updated to make it clear
that this behavior applies to C as well as C++ and explain what it means in a
bit more detail (presume that C users have no idea how C++ idioms work).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134016
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
