ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > @emaxx-google, @ilya-biryukov, do you think we can move forward even though > don't have a reproducer yet? It feels we are stuck on that one case on a > downstream client -- worst case maybe the devs can work it around by changing > source code for that one case?
Yes, I'm in favor of this. I feel it, more or less, doesn't make sense to wait for a downstream without a reproducer without a DDL ... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
