================
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fsyntax-only -std=c++20 -Wconversion %s
+
+void c8(char8_t);
+void c16(char16_t);
+void c32(char32_t);
+
+void test(char8_t u8, char16_t u16, char32_t u32) {
+ c8(u8);
+ c8(u16); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char16_t' to
'char8_t' may lose precision and change the meaning of the represented code
unit}}
+ c8(u32); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char32_t' to
'char8_t' may lose precision and change the meaning of the represented code
unit}}
+
+ c16(u8); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char8_t' to
'char16_t' may change the meaning of the represented code unit}}
+ c16(u16);
+ c16(u32); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char32_t' to
'char16_t' may lose precision and change the meaning of the represented code
unit}}
+
+ c32(u8); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char8_t' to
'char32_t' may change the meaning of the represented code unit}}
+ c32(u16); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'char16_t' to
'char32_t' may change the meaning of the represented code unit}}
+ c32(u32);
+
+
+ c8(char32_t(0x7f));
+ c8(char32_t(0x80)); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char32_t' to 'char8_t' changes the meaning of the codepoint '<U+0080>'}}
+
+ c8(char16_t(0x7f));
+ c8(char16_t(0x80)); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char16_t' to 'char8_t' changes the meaning of the codepoint '<U+0080>'}}
+ c8(char16_t(0xD800)); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char16_t' to 'char8_t' changes the meaning of the code unit '<0xD800>'}}
+ c8(char16_t(0xE000)); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char16_t' to 'char8_t' changes the meaning of the codepoint '<U+E000>'}}
+
+
+ c16(char32_t(0x7f));
+ c16(char32_t(0x80));
+ c16(char32_t(0xD7FF));
+ c16(char32_t(0xD800)); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char32_t' to 'char16_t' changes the meaning of the code unit '<0xD800>'}}
+ c16(char32_t(0xE000));
+ c16(char32_t(U'🐉')); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from
'char32_t' to 'char16_t' changes the meaning of the codepoint '🐉'}}
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
There is a distinction between a code unit and a code point in the diagnostic
message already. Which I think is useful information. But the distinction
between printable and not can just be the presentation,
> We could also present both the source value and the post conversion result to
> make it more explicit how the meaning changes. For example:
Presenting the source is something I tried, but because one side is always
going to be invalid (ie not a complete code point) it's not actually useful
> Or, if char16_t happens to be larger than 16 bits (I'm not sure we should
> care about this case though):
This is not a scenario in Clang
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138708
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
