================
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c++20 -fopenmp
-fopenmp-version=60 -fsyntax-only -Wuninitialized -verify %s
+
+void func() {
+
+ // expected-error@+2 {{statement after '#pragma omp fuse' must be a loop
sequence containing canonical loops or loop-generating constructs}}
+ #pragma omp fuse
+ ;
+
+ // expected-error@+2 {{statement after '#pragma omp fuse' must be a for
loop}}
+ #pragma omp fuse
+ {int bar = 0;}
+
+ // expected-error@+4 {{statement after '#pragma omp fuse' must be a for
loop}}
+ #pragma omp fuse
+ {
+ for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);
+ int x = 2;
+ }
+
+ // expected-error@+2 {{statement after '#pragma omp fuse' must be a loop
sequence containing canonical loops or loop-generating constructs}}
+ #pragma omp fuse
+ #pragma omp for
+ for (int i = 0; i < 7; ++i)
+ ;
+
+ {
+ // expected-error@+2 {{expected statement}}
+ #pragma omp fuse
+ }
+
+ // expected-warning@+1 {{extra tokens at the end of '#pragma omp fuse' are
ignored}}
+ #pragma omp fuse foo
+ {
+ for (int i = 0; i < 7; ++i)
+ ;
+ for(int j = 0; j < 100; ++j);
+
+ }
+
+
+ // expected-error@+1 {{unexpected OpenMP clause 'final' in directive
'#pragma omp fuse'}}
+ #pragma omp fuse final(0)
+ {
+ for (int i = 0; i < 7; ++i)
+ ;
+ for(int j = 0; j < 100; ++j);
+
+ }
+
+ //expected-error@+4 {{loop after '#pragma omp fuse' is not in canonical
form}}
----------------
alexey-bataev wrote:
Why do you need the second message, if there's already another one, requiring
canonical loop form?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
