I'm definitely in favor of efforts to defragment our many CI systems, but I also don't want to stop people from doing more testing. :)
If AppVeyor is providing free testing resource to OSS projects, then great, let's try using it and see how it goes. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > Fragmentation of the bots is not ideal. While I totally understand Eric's > reasoning for doing so, and am delighted to see another Windows bot > helping to ensure quality code, I think this is a bit of a slippery slope. > We already have the main Buildbots, Green Dragon, Chapuni's Bots, a myriad > of private bots and now this new bot. I don't think it is reasonable to > ask people to have to visit several different places to check if their > commit broke something. Anecdotally, I find many people will only look at > lab.llvm.org:8011. They will check Green Dragon if they get an email and > then only if the email does not get lost in the noise. Some folks are > regular users of bb.pgr.jp but the actual number or regular visitors I > don't know. > > Perhaps it would be a more beneficial discussion to talk about putting > together some type of portal which displays results from all the CI systems > in one place? I for one would love an interface which would be able to > show any given commit and how is has performed across the board. Something > like this could possibly allow for anyone to stand up a bot or CI > infrastructure of their choosing and then have that system integrated in a > common reporting platform so it is useful and accessible to everyone. > > Thoughts? > > -Mike > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.am...@apple.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.am...@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.am...@apple.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What would be the status of these buildbots? Is it for your private >>>>> usage? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I intend for them to be public Windows buildbots for libc++. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I’m not sure it’d be OK to send blame email to contributors based on >>>> this though. >>>> >>> >>> I don't see why not (at least once the bot is stable). Can you elaborate? >>> >>> >>> I don’t think there is a precedent for having a bot that does not >>> checkout from SVN and email using the canonical SVN revision number. >>> >> >> I understand share your concern about the emails using nonsensical git >> hashes as opposed to SVN revision numbers. >> Apart from that I have no idea why the version control used by the CI >> matters. It should have to effect on the build or the results. >> >> >> I don’t know, but other people may have other concern that I don’t >> necessarily anticipate.. >> >> >> >>> >>> So it does not seems like a given to me (not that I’m against it) and >>> would require a discussion on the mailing-list first IMO. >>> >> >> We might as well continue having it now since it's been started. I'll >> re-raise the issue in a month or so when the bot is >> actually stable enough to consider sending emails. >> >> >> I think it deserve a separate thread to deal with this, so that the >> thread title help making sure no-one miss the discussion. >> >> — >> Mehdi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
