jhuber6 wrote:

> I don't think OpenMP is more special than HIP here. Anything exposed to the 
> host should not be internalized. In addition, OpenMP actually also heavily 
> uses internalization as well in OpenMPOpt. It is likely that this change 
> exposes something bad in the downstream.
> 
> The motivation of this change was to apply ThinLTO for OpenMP. Given our 
> current approach to link device runtime, it will be treated as a regular 
> input file and then goes through the backend as well, which is completely 
> unnecessary. Its whole purpose should be for function import. After that, it 
> should be discarded.

Not fully understanding this, right now the OpenMP library is linked as a 
normal static library `-lompdevice`. What requires special treatment here? I go 
out of my way to remove needing these AMD specific hacks so I'm wondering what 
necessitates putting it back in.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138365
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to