================ @@ -26,11 +26,15 @@ typedef vbool64_t fixed_bool64_t __attribute__((riscv_rvv_vector_bits(__riscv_v_ // // CHECK-128-LABEL: @call_bool32_ff( // CHECK-128-NEXT: entry: +// CHECK-128-NEXT: [[SAVED_VALUE:%.*]] = alloca <1 x i8>, align 1 ---------------- paulwalker-arm wrote:
@nikic - Is the removal a prerequisite of being able to land this PR? @topperc / @asi-sc - Any objections to the PR being reverted? Fully or Partly? Given the size of the regression (9x) I was hoping to backport this fix to LLVM 20. I guess this might not be possible if that means removing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100110 from LLVM 20 as well? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130973 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits