zahiraam wrote: > I think this is a reasonable way forward for right now; we can bring back the > enumerator once we're actually using it. WDYT @zahiraam ?
I tend to think so too. But I am waiting for a response from the math library people internally to make sure that we don't loose compatibility with `icc` doing this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
