================
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
   <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/unsafe-functions>` check to allow specifying
   additional C++ member functions to match.
 
+- Improved :doc:`cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic
+  <clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic>` check by
+  fix false positives related to operator overloading and templates.
----------------
flovent wrote:

I think template should be mentioned because it's the necessary condition in 
this false positive, for `std::map::operator[]` or other indexing operators 
like `std::vector::operator[]` outside of template, there will be `CallExpr` 
generated, this checker didn't match `CallExpr` before this PR's change.



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127394
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to