It does sound pretty similar to me from the blog post. I think this is a decent place to start from.
On Apr 24, 2017 11:55 AM, "David Majnemer via Phabricator via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > majnemer requested changes to this revision. > majnemer added a comment. > This revision now requires changes to proceed. > > I don't think this is correct. GDR (of Microsoft) says the behavior is > different: https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/5dh7j5/visual_c_ > introduces_permissive_for_conformance/da5fxjj/ > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D32435 > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
