================
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection 
-verify=expected,default %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection 
-analyzer-config legacy-inlining-prevention=false -verify=expected,disabled %s
+
+int getNum(void); // Get an opaque number.
+
+void clang_analyzer_numTimesReached(void);
+void clang_analyzer_dump(int arg);
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Simple case: inlined function never reaches `analyzer-max-loop`.
+
+int inner_simple(void) {
+  clang_analyzer_numTimesReached(); // expected-warning {{2}}
+  return 42;
+}
+
+int outer_simple(void) {
+  int x = inner_simple();
+  int y = inner_simple();
+  return 53 / (x - y); // expected-warning {{Division by zero}}
+}
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Inlined function always reaches `analyzer-max-loop`.
+
+int inner_fixed_loop_1(void) {
+  int i;
+  clang_analyzer_numTimesReached(); // expected-warning {{1}}
----------------
balazs-benics-sonarsource wrote:

You could pass a `const char*` from a string literal to differentiate which is 
inlined when observing its value using a `clang_analyzer_dump()` at the 
beginning of this inlined function. That should make it clear that for the 
first time its inlined, but for the second time it's not.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136720
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to