KanRobert wrote: > > > Introduce an option (-mapx-relax-relocations) to control the emission of > > > the new APX relocations. It's off by default to keep backward > > > compatibility with old version of ld and other linkers without APX > > > support. And EGPR and NDD are also suppressed to avoid the instructions > > > updated incorrectly by old version of linkers. > > > > > > Not understand this. IIUC, either we should not emit APX instructions at > > all, which is controlled by `-m[no-]apxf`, or we should not relax the all > > the relocations, which is controlled by `-Wl,--no-relax`. > > If the APX relocation types are emitted in MC, they cannot be recognized by > old version of linkers. It leads to APX features unavailable on existing > Linux OSes with old version of linkers. `--no-relax` just disables the GOT > optimization in linker, and it cannot resolve the link error of unsupported > relocation type as mentioned above.
But if you just old relocations for APX instructions and `no-relax` is not used. Wouldn't the old linker do the relaxation incorrectly and silently? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136660 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
