github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,c -- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp clang/test/Analysis/builtin_overflow.c clang/test/Analysis/builtin_overflow_notes.c `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp index a2f6172ca..4dd692b5f 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp @@ -121,10 +121,9 @@ private: } // namespace const NoteTag *BuiltinFunctionChecker::createBuiltinOverflowNoteTag( - CheckerContext &C, bool overflow, SVal Arg1, SVal Arg2, - SVal Result) const { - return C.getNoteTag([Result, Arg1, Arg2, overflow]( - PathSensitiveBugReport &BR, llvm::raw_ostream &OS) { + CheckerContext &C, bool overflow, SVal Arg1, SVal Arg2, SVal Result) const { + return C.getNoteTag([Result, Arg1, Arg2, overflow](PathSensitiveBugReport &BR, + llvm::raw_ostream &OS) { if (!BR.isInteresting(Result)) return; @@ -200,10 +199,9 @@ void BuiltinFunctionChecker::handleOverflowBuiltin(const CallEvent &Call, NewState = addTaint(NewState, *L); } - C.addTransition( - NewState, - createBuiltinOverflowNoteTag( - C, /*overflow=*/isOverflow, Arg1, Arg2, RetVal)); + C.addTransition(NewState, + createBuiltinOverflowNoteTag(C, /*overflow=*/isOverflow, + Arg1, Arg2, RetVal)); }; if (NotOverflow) `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136345 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits