================
@@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ void errno_getcwd(char *Buf, size_t Sz) {
clang_analyzer_eval(errno != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(Path == NULL); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
if (errno) {} // no warning
- } else if (Path == NULL) {
- clang_analyzer_eval(errno != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
- if (errno) {} // no warning
----------------
steakhal wrote:
Alright. I think I understand this now.
Because of `ReturnValueCondition(BO_EQ, ArgNo(0))` on the success path we
assume that the returned pointer is the same (aka. equal to) the first
argument, which means that `Path` holds the same pointer as `Buf`.
Because of this, dropping the `ArgConstraint(NotNull(ArgNo(0)))` means that no
longer affects the return value `Path`. This is actually a good thing.
Could you please help me how does the test failure look like for you if you
would keep this hunk?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135720
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
