llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> That's what the current interpreter does as well. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135948.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp (+2-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp index c09d3224b1f36..fcb33efd73f2f 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp @@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ APValue Pointer::toAPValue(const ASTContext &ASTCtx) const { return APValue( APValue::LValueBase::getTypeInfo( TypeInfo, QualType(PointeeStorage.Typeid.TypeInfoType, 0)), - CharUnits::Zero(), APValue::NoLValuePath{}); + CharUnits::Zero(), {}, + /*OnePastTheEnd=*/false, /*IsNull=*/false); } // Build the lvalue base from the block. `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135948 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
