================ @@ -0,0 +1,414 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++23 -Wno-unused-value -Wno-unused-but-set-variable +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,bitfieldwarnings -std=c++23 -Wno-unused-value -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wbitfield-width -Wbitfield-enum-conversion + +// This is more complex than the C version because the user can specify the ---------------- ojhunt wrote:
Good call, and this found a bug that I think exists in other enum and/or bitfield cases, specifically I was using `isSignedIntegerType()` instead of `isSignedIntegerOrEnumerationType()`, which I _think_ is the semantically correct thing to use to identify a signed type. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
