================
@@ -831,6 +832,14 @@ of different sizes and signs is forbidden in binary and
ternary builtins.
semantics, see `LangRef
<http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-min-intrinsics-comparation>`_
for the comparison.
+ T __builtin_elementwise_clz(T x[, T y]) return the number of leading 0
bits in the first argument. If integer types
+ the first argument is 0 and an
optional second argument is provided,
+ the second argument is
returned. If the first argument is 0 but only
+ one argument is provided, the
behaviour is undefined.
+ T __builtin_elementwise_ctz(T x[, T y]) return the number of trailing
0 bits in the first argument. If integer types
+ the first argument is 0 and an
optional second argument is provided,
+ the second argument is
returned. If the first argument is 0 but only
+ one argument is provided, the
behaviour is undefined.
----------------
arsenm wrote:
Wondering if we should use the names of the llvm intrinsics. If the arguments
and behavior are different from the legacy gcc builtins, we don't need to copy
the name
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131995
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
