arsenm wrote: > > Turns out not really, I ran spec with this about 2 years ago and the only > > non-noise change was a mild improvement > > Looking at the PR you linked, seems like there was still not a clear > consensus on the default change no?
Yes, there were people who are wrong and need to find the time to push this forward. > (And I'd assume consumers like llvm-translator won't be too happy about this > breaking change no?) It's not a breaking change, it's a theoretical loss of optimization by default in unanalyzable call situations. Even if we leave the wart of not fixing wrong by default, we still need a noconvergent attribute https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134844 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
