dberlin added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31885#727529, @efriedma wrote:
> > Such an effective type change must be more explicit than "i allocated > > typeless memory, and so i can do what i want with it". > > How can you change the effective type of malloc'ed memory in C, if storing a > value of a new type doesn't have any effect? memset? A new C language > feature? Something else? memcpy is the traditional way, but in some sense it doesn't matter. What you've pointed out is a clear standards bug in the sense that there *is no way* to implement it without removing TBAA from the standard. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D31885 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
