zyn0217 wrote: > This once again looks like an attempt at hacking around our lack of delayed > lambda body instantiation... And this one has some pretty sizable negatives > as far as I can see. I'm not sure I really like this direction.
Yeah, admittedly this is another workaround of not having that mechanism. But the bug was a 15 regression, and due to some historic incorrect patches (which I'm fixing here) it ends up becoming hard to get the behavior correct as 14. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134038 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
