AaronBallman wrote: > > There is weak consensus to add `stdcountof.h` which supplies a `countof` > > macro. However, there's no changes to the standard which add one (yet), so > > I figured that can be done in a follow-up. > > Then I'd really like a feature. We already have a bunch, It makes sense to > add one for that imo > > ``` > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_alignas, LangOpts.C11) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_alignof, LangOpts.C11) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_atomic, LangOpts.C11) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_generic_selections, LangOpts.C11) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_static_assert, LangOpts.C11) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_thread_local, LangOpts.C11 > &&PP.getTargetInfo().isTLSSupported()) > include/clang/Basic/Features.def:FEATURE(c_fixed_enum, LangOpts.C23) > ```
So you want this to be a `FEATURE` in C2y and an `EXTENSION` in older language modes? And when we get the `countof` macro in a few months, this becomes unnecessary? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133125 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
