spall wrote: > > > For example, for `abs`, it still depends on the _HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY > > > availability attribute. Does this PR intend to keep abs overloads using > > > half "unexposed"? Or should that overload for abs be exposed too? > > > > > > Oh I see what you are referring to. That might be my mistake; let me double > > check if I used the wrong __HLSL_AVAILABILITY > > Yeah, if the intention of this PR is to expose all half type overloads > always, then I would think there is no more utility in defining > `HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY` anymore.
I think I was meant to use _HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY and not _HLSL_AVAILABILITY; I'll fix that. Thanks for noticing the error! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
