tbaederr wrote:

> > It looks like this is similar to `__builtin_constant_p` - what is the 
> > proposed behavior wrt. side effects in the evaluated expression? gcc and 
> > clang disagree about this a lot currently: https://godbolt.org/z/rbneznT9z
> 
> IIUC this intrinsic shouldn't be similar to `__builtin_constant_p`. It's just 
> investigating properties of the type and value category of an expression 
> (like `std::is_lvalue_reference_v<decltype((expr))>` in C++ but with more 
> magics).

That's fine with me. If the argument isn't evaluated anyway, we don't need the 
`SpeculativeEvaluationRAII` and `IgnoreSideEffectsRAII` either.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132524
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to