================
@@ -1518,6 +1518,50 @@ static void verifyDiagnosticWording(const Record &Diag) {
// runs into odd situations like [[clang::warn_unused_result]],
// #pragma clang, or --unwindlib=libgcc.
}
+
+/// ClangDiagsCompatIDsEmitter - Emit a set of 'compatibility diagnostic ids'
+/// that map to a set of 2 regular diagnostic ids each and which are used to
+/// simplify emitting compatibility warnings.
+void clang::EmitClangDiagsCompatIDs(const llvm::RecordKeeper &Records,
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Are we anticipating doing this multiple times? Why the `BEGIN` and `END`? Is
the idea that we'd have a different list for parse vs sema? I'd prefer we get
1 list, then we don't need `BEGIN` and `END`, but I haven't thought through
this enough.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132348
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
