================
@@ -280,3 +313,77 @@ mlir::LogicalResult CIRGenFunction::emitReturnStmt(const
ReturnStmt &s) {
return mlir::success();
}
+
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRGenFunction::emitForStmt(const ForStmt &s) {
+ cir::ForOp forOp;
+
+ // TODO: pass in an array of attributes.
+ auto forStmtBuilder = [&]() -> mlir::LogicalResult {
+ mlir::LogicalResult loopRes = mlir::success();
+ // Evaluate the first part before the loop.
+ if (s.getInit())
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Oh interesting... hrmph. This is supposed to be in scope with the for IIRC, do
we need to create a lexical scope here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132266
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
