================
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
+//===--- UseScopedLockCheck.cpp - clang-tidy 
------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "UseScopedLockCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Stmt.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h"
+#include <iterator>
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
+
+namespace {
+
+bool isLockGuard(const QualType &Type) {
+  if (const auto *Record = Type->getAs<RecordType>())
+    if (const RecordDecl *Decl = Record->getDecl())
+      return Decl->getName() == "lock_guard" && Decl->isInStdNamespace();
----------------
PiotrZSL wrote:

There is assert in getName already, and this is a reason why I didn't want 
assert but proper handling of anonumous classes. Handle this correctly instead 
of crasing.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126434
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to