================
@@ -10555,6 +10555,43 @@ static void checkArithmeticNull(Sema &S, ExprResult
&LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
<< LHS.get()->getSourceRange() << RHS.get()->getSourceRange();
}
+static void DetectPrecisionLossInComplexDivision(Sema &S, QualType DivisorTy,
+ SourceLocation OpLoc) {
+ // Either real/real or complex/real division.
+ // Either way there can be no precision loss.
+ auto *CT = DivisorTy->getAs<ComplexType>();
+ if (!CT)
+ return;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
I noticed we were passing the *LHS* expression to this, but now we’re passing
in the *RHS* type? Is that intended?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131477
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
