compnerd wrote: > > Take the opportunity to tighten up the code slightly by ensuring that we do > > not access out-of-bounds characters when lexing the token. > > That's a nice touch :-)
😄 > Do we already have tests somewhere checking that we can codegen this, or do > we need to add that? I think that generally the `_BitInt` work should have given us the appropriate coverage. We use existing support for the Microsoft extension type `__int128` which has been there for a long time. I feel like we should have appropriate coverage already, but if you have a specific bit of coverage that you think would be good, I can try to integrate that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130993 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
