dwblaikie wrote: > Could you please take a look at the attached DWARF and let me know your > concerns with the implementation?
Sure - I see the effect, but I still think it's probably not worthwhile due to the limited capacity, inconsistency (due to that limited expressiveness) between direct uses of type parameters and situations where a template parameter is passed to another template, and missing consumer support (which I realize is a chicken-and-egg problem, and not always a deal breaker if there's valuable benefits to be had once consumers do support a given feature). But perhaps other reviewers have different takes on it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
