================
@@ -759,13 +759,11 @@ Sema::BuildDependentDeclRefExpr(const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
TemplateArgs);
}
-bool Sema::DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
- NamedDecl *Instantiation,
- bool InstantiatedFromMember,
- const NamedDecl *Pattern,
- const NamedDecl *PatternDef,
- TemplateSpecializationKind TSK,
- bool Complain /*= true*/) {
+bool Sema::DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate(
+ SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation, NamedDecl *Instantiation,
+ bool InstantiatedFromMember, const NamedDecl *Pattern,
+ const NamedDecl *PatternDef, TemplateSpecializationKind TSK,
+ bool Complain /*= true*/, bool *Unreachable) {
----------------
shafik wrote:
@AaronBallman I don't think I have seen annotation before, annotating the
default value in a function definition.
Are there tools that verify this like we have for [argument
comments?](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/argument-comment.html)
Otherwise I don't think these make as much sense, although I sympathize with
the sentiment behind them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129031
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
