ojhunt wrote:

I'm planning on removing the docs, but I've left them in for now just so that 
reviewers can read them if they want context to understand the PR.

@cor3ntin @AaronBallman @erichkeane I'm ok removing the flag, I'll look into 
how to diagnose the "you're using an extension/future language feature". I'm 
going to completely remove the optional destroying delete path, I think it's 
very clear now that it's a bad idea so there's no reason to keep it around.

In the meantime, I've discovered why I missed some of @cor3ntin's feedback 
(despite only using the annoying merge commits/push changes approach GH still 
drops comments from the diff if it thinks they're "outdated") so I'm going to 
have to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which comments are still 
relevant - Corentin pinged on a few but I suspect those aren't the only cases.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113510
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to