llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> If the ASTContext says so, don't bother trying to constant evaluate the given builtin. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130431.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp (+3) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp index b8c4ef2f48a79..14e716daa3f12 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp @@ -2059,6 +2059,9 @@ static bool interp__builtin_memchr(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, bool InterpretBuiltin(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Function *F, const CallExpr *Call, uint32_t BuiltinID) { + if (!S.getASTContext().BuiltinInfo.isConstantEvaluated(BuiltinID)) + return false; + const InterpFrame *Frame = S.Current; std::optional<PrimType> ReturnT = S.getContext().classify(Call); `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130431 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
