================ @@ -70,16 +93,37 @@ class ParentMapContext::ParentMap { push_back(Value); } bool contains(const DynTypedNode &Value) { - return Seen.contains(Value); + assert(Value.getMemoizationData()); + bool found = FragileLazySeenCache.contains(&Value); + while (!found && ItemsProcessed < Items.size()) { + found |= FragileLazySeenCache.insert(&Items[ItemsProcessed]).second; + ++ItemsProcessed; + } + return found; } void push_back(const DynTypedNode &Value) { - if (!Value.getMemoizationData() || Seen.insert(Value).second) + if (!Value.getMemoizationData() || !contains(Value)) { ---------------- higher-performance wrote:
I could definitely optimize these further like in the ways you mention, but those are just (very small) constant-factor savings in time, at a significant readability and fragility cost. I didn't get the feeling it's worth it to be honest -- do you? Note that the performance graphs almost coincide with Clang 17's right now. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129934 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits