Bigcheese wrote: Given that some `#pragma`s also impact Sema things, I think `scope` is a bit confusing for what it applies to. I think something like `macro_scope` would be a better name.
As for the extension itself, I think it could be useful, but I'm not sure how our language extension policy applies here for pragmas. This is kind of a general purpose extension and would make the code only usable with Clang, as conditionally applying the pragma would mean the macros still show up and your code breaks (otherwise why would you have the pragma in the first place). This also hides include guards, and I don't think it does anything about include skipping, so it may behave as if the include guard was still there. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121025 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
