================
@@ -254,6 +254,224 @@ void foo() {
}
} // namespace CXX17_aggregate_construction
+namespace newexpr_init_list_initialization {
----------------
Flandini wrote:
They currently take different code paths and have different results in CSA. I
think ideally they would use the same code.
The issue this PR is for doesn't properly initialize in this case:
```
struct S {
int foo;
int bar;
};
void f() {
S *s = new S{
.foo = 13,
.bar = 1,
};
int retval = s->bar;
delete s;
}
```
But if you change remove this new expression and list initialize some `S` with
automatic storage duration, this works as expected.
I plan to change the two to use the same binding code, but I think there would
still be some differences in the code in expr engine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127702
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
