romanova-ekaterina wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up, so I should not do a detailed code review for > PR127749? Is there more info on what you mean by a "no-backend DTLTO"? "Actually, please review whatever you would like to at this point, Theresa. I don't want to get in the way of hearing what you think - we're keen to your input. I just wanted to point out that since another branch is coming, you may wish to wait until it arrives if you think a side-by-side comparison would be a good way of doing things. To clarify: that other branch won't be put up as a pull request, but we can decide how to proceed here if the general design shown in that other branch is preferred. I also mentioned that it will appear in a few days, but that's really dependent on the results of some more internal review. We're working hard on it!" https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
