This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL298927: [analyzer] Fix symbolication for unknown unary 
increment/decrement results. (authored by dergachev).

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D31289?vs=92812&id=93251#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D31289

Files:
  cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
  cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
  cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c


Index: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
@@ -118,3 +118,8 @@
   extern float globalFloat;
   clang_analyzer_eval(globalFloat); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
 }
+
+void locAsIntegerCasts(void *p) {
+  int x = (int) p;
+  clang_analyzer_eval(++x < 10); // no-crash // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+}
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
     // Conjure a new symbol if necessary to recover precision.
     if (Result.isUnknown()){
       DefinedOrUnknownSVal SymVal =
-        svalBuilder.conjureSymbolVal(nullptr, Ex, LCtx,
+        svalBuilder.conjureSymbolVal(nullptr, U, LCtx,
                                      currBldrCtx->blockCount());
       Result = SymVal;
 
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@
                              resultTy);
         case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
           // Transform the integer into a location and compare.
+          // FIXME: This only makes sense for comparisons. If we want to, say,
+          // add 1 to a LocAsInteger, we'd better unpack the Loc and add to it,
+          // then pack it back into a LocAsInteger.
           llvm::APSInt i = rhs.castAs<nonloc::ConcreteInt>().getValue();
           BasicVals.getAPSIntType(Context.VoidPtrTy).apply(i);
           return evalBinOpLL(state, op, lhsL, makeLoc(i), resultTy);
@@ -942,6 +945,8 @@
     rhs = convertToArrayIndex(rhs).castAs<NonLoc>();
     SVal index = UnknownVal();
     const MemRegion *superR = nullptr;
+    // We need to know the type of the pointer in order to add an integer to 
it.
+    // Depending on the type, different amount of bytes is added.
     QualType elementType;
 
     if (const ElementRegion *elemReg = dyn_cast<ElementRegion>(region)) {
@@ -955,6 +960,10 @@
       assert(op == BO_Add || op == BO_Sub);
       index = (op == BO_Add) ? rhs : evalMinus(rhs);
       superR = region;
+      // TODO: Is this actually reliable? Maybe improving our MemRegion
+      // hierarchy to provide typed regions for all non-void pointers would be
+      // better. For instance, we cannot extend this towards LocAsInteger
+      // operations, where result type of the expression is integer.
       if (resultTy->isAnyPointerType())
         elementType = resultTy->getPointeeType();
     }


Index: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/casts.c
@@ -118,3 +118,8 @@
   extern float globalFloat;
   clang_analyzer_eval(globalFloat); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
 }
+
+void locAsIntegerCasts(void *p) {
+  int x = (int) p;
+  clang_analyzer_eval(++x < 10); // no-crash // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+}
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
     // Conjure a new symbol if necessary to recover precision.
     if (Result.isUnknown()){
       DefinedOrUnknownSVal SymVal =
-        svalBuilder.conjureSymbolVal(nullptr, Ex, LCtx,
+        svalBuilder.conjureSymbolVal(nullptr, U, LCtx,
                                      currBldrCtx->blockCount());
       Result = SymVal;
 
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@
                              resultTy);
         case nonloc::ConcreteIntKind: {
           // Transform the integer into a location and compare.
+          // FIXME: This only makes sense for comparisons. If we want to, say,
+          // add 1 to a LocAsInteger, we'd better unpack the Loc and add to it,
+          // then pack it back into a LocAsInteger.
           llvm::APSInt i = rhs.castAs<nonloc::ConcreteInt>().getValue();
           BasicVals.getAPSIntType(Context.VoidPtrTy).apply(i);
           return evalBinOpLL(state, op, lhsL, makeLoc(i), resultTy);
@@ -942,6 +945,8 @@
     rhs = convertToArrayIndex(rhs).castAs<NonLoc>();
     SVal index = UnknownVal();
     const MemRegion *superR = nullptr;
+    // We need to know the type of the pointer in order to add an integer to it.
+    // Depending on the type, different amount of bytes is added.
     QualType elementType;
 
     if (const ElementRegion *elemReg = dyn_cast<ElementRegion>(region)) {
@@ -955,6 +960,10 @@
       assert(op == BO_Add || op == BO_Sub);
       index = (op == BO_Add) ? rhs : evalMinus(rhs);
       superR = region;
+      // TODO: Is this actually reliable? Maybe improving our MemRegion
+      // hierarchy to provide typed regions for all non-void pointers would be
+      // better. For instance, we cannot extend this towards LocAsInteger
+      // operations, where result type of the expression is integer.
       if (resultTy->isAnyPointerType())
         elementType = resultTy->getPointeeType();
     }
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to