jroelofs added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31375#712152, @jroelofs wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31375#711839, @EricWF wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31375#710897, @jroelofs wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31375#710891, @compnerd wrote: > > > > > > > What happens when you try building it in tree? > > > > > > > > > The docs-libunwind-html target is missing, and the docs don't get built. > > > > > > Shouldn't that be what happens when libunwind is built > > "out-of-tree"/standalone, not the other way around? > > > "is" != "ought". That's what /is/ happening, not necessarily what we want to > happen. And FWIW, it looks like libcxx's docs behave the same way... So this might be a problem with the way the `runtimes` dir works. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31375 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
