preames wrote:

> > > I am kind of confused now. So the situation here is that RVIOS has 
> > > already implemented these vendor extensions in cores and RVIOS is also 
> > > trying to make these extensions official RVI standards, right?
> > 
> > 
> > You're confusing two things. We (Rivos) have defined a set of custom vendor 
> > extensions - this patch is the first in that sub-series. We are _also and 
> > separately_ proposing a subset of instructions for consideration at RVI for 
> > eventual standardization. As an example of how these are different, see 
> > XRivosVisni in the linked repo. That's a vendor extension which relates to 
> > gaps identified in RVV, but for which we're not currently proposing an 
> > extension at RVI.
> 
> Thanks, I'd like to know if these vendor extensions have been implemented in 
> some type-out-ed cores. I have this question because I saw that these vendor 
> extensions are of version 0.1. If they are going to be changeable (and 
> experimental), then why are we supporting XRivosVizip extension in a hurry 
> since XRivosVizip and Zvzip are overlapped.

In general, vendor extensions remain in draft (i.e. experimental), until 
hardware is announced.  I can not comment on any hardware plans, or timelines.  

As the lead of the Zvzip work, I can say that I believe having a vendor 
extension with in tree support will make it easier for others to evaluate the 
zvzip proposal.  In particular, the current assignment of the zvzip opcodes in 
custom_2 is about to be removed as that's really not appropriate for an RVI 
proposal.  Given that, landing anything for zvzip is pretty much a non-starter. 
 However, this is only vaguely related to this patch.  

Also, I disagree with your characterization of anything being done here as "in 
a hurry".  All normal review and discussion timelines have been, and will 
continue to be, followed.  


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to