xiangzhai added a comment. Hi Raphael,
Thanks for your reply! > regarding performance: Last time I checked we spend most of the time on the > verification of the hash values. We can do some tricks to make this faster > (like delaying the verification to the end of the constraints where we have > much less clones and therefore less overhead with this) > > regarding false-positives: We will do some basic stuff to reduce them > soon-ish (e.g. increasing the minimum clone size default value, filtering > those generated files). Afterwards we probably need some fancier way of > teaching the checker what is a valid clone and what not. > > If you have some actual bugs that are found by the checker, please send them > to me (teemperor [AT] gmail.com) that we can add them to the regression tests > :) I will test your updated patch tomorrow by testing with KDE/GNOME real projects. Regards, Leslie Zhai https://reviews.llvm.org/D23418 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
