HighCommander4 wrote: > (For example `ClangdModules` was an action we were trying to take in this > direction. It actually aims to provide people infrastructure to implement > their desired functionality in clangd, while limiting resource and > maintenance costs to only that specific feature and its users. but then we > took an arrow in the knee)
Could you say more about this? What happened to `ClangdModules`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118102 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
