================
@@ -223,6 +221,41 @@
} while (0)
#endif
+#define _LIBUNWIND_TRACING_COMPACT_UNWIND (0)
+#if !_LIBUNWIND_TRACING_COMPACT_UNWIND
+#define _LIBUNWIND_TRACE_COMPACT_UNWIND0(msg)
+#define _LIBUNWIND_TRACE_COMPACT_UNWIND(msg, ...)
+#else
+#define _LIBUNWIND_TRACE_COMPACT_UNWIND0(msg)
\
+ do {
\
+ fprintf(stderr, msg);
\
+ } while (0)
+#define _LIBUNWIND_TRACE_COMPACT_UNWIND(msg, ...)
\
+ do {
\
+ fprintf(stderr, msg, __VA_ARGS__);
\
+ } while (0)
----------------
michael-kenzel wrote:
It probably would; the reason why I did it the way I did was consistency with
the existing `_LIBUNWIND_LOG`/`_LIBUNWIND_LOG0` macros. I guess best would be
to just rewrite those in your suggested way as well. But maybe this should be
done in a separate PR to keep this one focused on just replacing `fprintf`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72040
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
