hfinkel added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30920#710329, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30920#710209, @hfinkel wrote: > > > Yes, we should do this. I don't understand why this is tricky. Actually, I > > think having these kinds of decisions explicit in the code of the > > transformations would be a positive development. > > > I think a high reason why I consider this tricky, it the part where I > mentioned that a single pass can have different behavior/level depending on > where it is in the pipeline. > But recently @joerg split SimplifyCFG into two wrapper passes, which may be > a good way of achieving what you're describing. I agree. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30920 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
