=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127...@github.com>
steakhal wrote: > It may cause confusion that "NullDereference" checker checks not only null > dereference but undefined pointer and label address too. Probably these > checks (specially label address) can be moved into this checker. (Or add the > new check to NullDereference without a new checker?) I see. Thanks. I dont have a firm opinion on the architecture. Usually we should go with what is more natural. If there would be signifficat semantic sharing, then a single checker works usually better. Its up to you. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127191 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
