llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: A. Jiang (frederick-vs-ja) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> P2280R4 is officially a defect report. Although Clang 20 only implementated it for C++23 and later, and #<!-- -->95474 accidently removed the DR status in `cxx_status.html`. I think we should mention that it is a DR but not backported yet. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127166.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/www/cxx_status.html (+8-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/www/cxx_status.html b/clang/www/cxx_status.html index 0fc3b1d314698..70490b2e4331f 100755 --- a/clang/www/cxx_status.html +++ b/clang/www/cxx_status.html @@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ <h2 id="cxx23">C++23 implementation status</h2> </tr> <tr> <td>Using unknown pointers and references in constant expressions</td> - <td><a href="https://wg21.link/P2280R4";>P2280R4</a></td> - <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 20</td> + <td><a href="https://wg21.link/P2280R4";>P2280R4</a> (<a href="#dr">DR</a>)</td> + <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 20 <a href="#p2280">(12)</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>static <code>operator()</code></td> @@ -510,6 +510,12 @@ <h2 id="cxx23">C++23 implementation status</h2> <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td> </tr> </table> + +<p> +<span id="p2280">(12): In Clang 20, this change is not yet retroactively +applied to pre-C++23 modes. +</span> +</p> </details> `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127166 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
