zyn0217 wrote: > > While this may not be the most optimal solution, we can likely go with it > > as-is to put the fire out. > > Given [this > comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126868#discussion_r1953948099) > (i.e. that the behaviour with this patch is correct for the dependent case > as well), is there anything else not optimal about this solution?
I was considering finding a better AST model, but it's more complex than the approach so this is good enough for now :P https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126868 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
