================ @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ Changes in existing checks <clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/unsafe-functions>` check to allow specifying additional C++ member functions to match. +- Improved :doc:`performance-noexcept-move-constructor + <clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor>`. Check allows + move-constructors with `noexcept(expr)`, even if `expr` evaluates to `false`, ---------------- EugeneZelenko wrote:
```suggestion move-constructors with ``noexcept(expr)``, even if ``expr`` evaluates to ``false``, ``` Language constructs. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126897 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
